You may like to think about what people find useful about any feedback – but this blog is specifically about psychometric profile feedback. What I hear people say is:
Me: 'How useful was the psychometric feedback session?'
Coach: 'It was very useful.'
Me: 'Why? What was good about it?'
Coach: 'Well, they basically agreed with it.'
However, all learning and development is predicated on change. People agreeing with their psychometric profile does not suggest change – it suggests affirming their pre-existing view of themselves. Whilst this has its place, there is so much more that can be achieved. The 4-part ACDC process is to remind you of what to look for and how to use it. As Will Schutz (author of the FIRO) stated so clearly – it is not the scores but the reaction to the scores that is the most important and useful. You can use the ACDC model (described below) to sensitise you to areas that you may not yet be making best use of:
Too often, people stop at Point 1 - Affirmation. This is clearly useful for engaging the coachee, giving the questionnaire credibility and helping them to gather their thoughts. Point 2 - Communication clearly takes this process further since people can find it very difficult to articulate who they are (and inviting people to complete a self-report questionnaire is essentially asking them that question). I have even had people who are embarrassed by the question! One actually said to me 'well, it's not for me to say - you'll have to ask others.' Point 3 - Discovery is where we begin to add something extra – potential insight as a prelude to helping people develop their auto-biographical narrative. The person is potentially extending or re-arranging how they currently view and describe themselves. Those familiar with Lewin’s change model (unfreezing-changing-refreezing) will recognise how this is beginning the unfreezing process required before change can occur. Point 4 - Challenge is where there can be the strongest reaction to a questionnaire. There can be a great temptation to go along with the person’s perception because, after all, they ‘know’ themselves and the questionnaire can be wrong. However, this reaction can often be the gold-dust in the change process – especially if the reaction is quite strong and emotional. Using the 1% rule (i.e. that there is always at least 1% of truth in all the feedback we receive) we can invite the person to explore their reaction more thoroughly. Here are some questions that can be useful:
If you want to watch a couple of videos which explore these ideas further, click below: